|
|
Posted by Mike Gardner on 06/02/06 12:00
In article <10Ifg.297$Cw3.54@trndny01>, "doc" <doc@anywhere.com> wrote:
> agree. is this not the math for miniDV format . . .
>
> 25 Mb/sec x 60 secs x 63 mins (on miniDV tape) = 94.5 Gb???
Convert b(its) to B(bytes) and you get about 13GB per hour.
>
> drd
>
> "Michael Gardner" <mgg@prairienet.org.xyz> wrote in message
> news:e22um3$gu4$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
> > In article <4aig1hFtdbfhU1@individual.net>,
> > "PTravel" <ptravel@ruyitang.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Mr. Tapeguy" <mr.tapeguy@pro-tape.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1145299810.542761.249740@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >> > However, JVC has a hard drive consumer camcorder out and I think you
> >> > will see a move toward these at some point.
> >>
> >> Not as currently implemented. The hard-drive consumer machines use MPEG
> >> of
> >> some flavor and have the same problems with increased compression and
> >> lack
> >> of easy editing. Now, a camcorder with a large hard drive that recorded
> >> DV-25 might be interesting, but it would have to be a mighty big hard
> >> drive.
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> > removable hard drives each holding 100G would not be that hard - then
> > again, 100G would be plenty for DV for most shooting.
> >
> > mgg
> > --
> > sig goes here
--
Though posted through facilities afforded by UIUC, though my employer,
this post and the opinions herein are mine alone and have nothing
whatsoever to do with my position or my employer.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|