|
|
Posted by Kaveh on 09/29/14 11:49
Spex <No.spam@ta.com> wrote:
[...]
> I believe that is the case. Personally I would not want to work in
> native HDV and would work with the AIC even though I'd use more HDD
> space. Its much less processor intensive and you should gain by having
> a more responsive editing experience. Output quality will also remain
> high. HDV is destroyed in just one generation IMHO.
I can understand that, having read how it works. I like the idea of
dealing with non-temporal compression for editing. Clearly faster and
more responsive in editing.
My problem is disk space when recording. I am due to record all sessions
of a 5 day conference. I have a 500 Gb disk, and happy to buy another
one. So I am thinking of recording in HDV, and converting later, for
editing. The only reason I am not using tape is that each session might
be more than one hour.
--
Kaveh
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|