|
|
Posted by RichardK on 06/13/06 10:21
NRen2k5 wrote:
> Jim wrote:
>
>> In article <Kwujg.26732$G97.418555@weber.videotron.net>, NRen2k5 wrote:
>>
>>> John McWilliams wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jim wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> No. Because regardless, there is that illegal lock-in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Time for you to put up or shut up. Show *exactly* how it is illegal.
>>>>> Cite the *exact* law that's being broken.
>>>
>>> I'm an electrical tech, not a fuckdamn lawyer. I ALREADY linked you
>>> to the Wikipedia articles on anti-competition law and vendor
>>> lock-ins, which you not surprisingly had nothing to say about.
>>
>>
>> What did you expect? You cited *Wikipedia* for fuck's sake!
>>
>> Cite the exact law, not just generalisations based on your own personal
>> feelings.
>
>
> Hire a lawyer if you want to find the exact law. I am now a lawyer.
Find the exact law if you want to do something other than repeat
baseless accusations you have no understanding of. If you cannot cite
the exact law, then you cannot prove that it is illegal, and therefore,
you're just stating opinion, and your opinion is a: wrong, and b: has no
basis in fact.
Richard
--
RichardK - http://www.dmc12.demon.co.uk/ - retro, music, cars.
2006 Mazda RX8, 1992 Sera Phase III -= Do Not Tempt With New Cars =-
"If the thought of something makes me giggle for more than 15 seconds I
am to assume I am not allowed to do it". * 64 is 128 for email *
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|