|
|
Posted by NRen2k5 on 10/06/34 11:50
Gary Tait wrote:
> NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com> wrote in news:hNNjg.33519$G97.585685
> @weber.videotron.net:
>
>> Jim wrote:
>>> NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jim wrote:
>>>>> NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> No. Because regardless, there is that illegal lock-in.
>>>>> Time for you to put up or shut up. Show *exactly* how it is
> illegal.
>>>>> Cite the *exact* law that's being broken.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim
>>>> Time for you to show how exactly how it is *not* illegal.
>>> Are you stupid? The burden of proof lies with the accuser.
>>>
>>> It's guilt that has to be proven, not innocence.
>> This is Usenet, not a court of law.
>>
>
> Still, I, and many others, want to know how the various online music
> stores and player manufacturers are breaking the law.
Apple. Not "various online music stores and player manufacturers". *Apple*.
--
http://pcguyelevated.ytmnd.com/
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|