|
|
Posted by Jay G. on 10/07/19 11:50
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:07:22 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 06:57:53 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>
>>On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 05:20:51 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:55:34 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>>>>
>>>>Looks like all the later Intel microprocessors won out over the 80186 in
>>>>terms of embedded applications.
>>>>
>>> I'd be willing to bet that 99% of those are SBCs ...
>>
>>Okay, I take that bet. Prove it.
>>
>>And since when do SBCs not count as embedded?
>>
>>1,750,000 hits for "SBC embedded"
>
> A "Single Board Computer" is, by definition, not an embedded device,
> and IS by definition a computer.
11,200,000 hits for "Single Board Computer embedded".
Here's some companies that even makes SBCs for embedded devices:
http://www.embeddedarm.com/epc/prod_SBC.htm
"Single Board Computers for Embedded Systems"
http://www.versalogic.com/
"VersaLogic Corporation is a leading provider of rugged single
board computers to OEMs for embedded and industrial control
applications."
http://www.applieddata.net/
"Welcome to Applied Data Systems, Inc. where we know that an embedded
system is more than a single board computer with a flat panel display."
-Jay
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|