Posted by NRen2k5 on 10/14/88 11:50

Stephen Adams wrote:
> NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com> writes:
>
>> Jim wrote:
>>> In article <vswkg.33162$jb.212367@wagner.videotron.net>, NRen2k5 wrote:
>>>>> Still, I, and many others, want to know how the various online music
>>>>> stores and player manufacturers are breaking the law.
>>>> Apple. Not "various online music stores and player manufacturers". *Apple*.
>>>>
>>> Apple are not breaking the law. If you can prove otherwise then do so,
>>> otherwise it remains your *opinion* that Apple are doing something illegal.
>> And it is your opinion that they are not breaking the law. Until you can
>> prove so, that is *your* opinion.
>
> Actually, no. You asserted that they are breaking the law. It's up to
> YOU to prove your assertion, or at least supply sufficient evidence that
> what you say is actually the case.
>
> The assumption, at least in the American system, is that you are NOT
> violating the law, and are innocent until such time as you are proved
> to be guilty. You don't have to prove your innocence - it's simply
> assumed.

And it is only an assumption.

--
http://pcguyelevated.ytmnd.com/

• Next in forum: Re: idon't do iPod
• Prev in forum: Re: can't hear some mp3 songs on pc.
• Thread view: Re: idon't do iPod

[Reply to this message]