|
|
Posted by Roy L. Fuchs on 10/07/24 11:51
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 07:52:02 GMT, 123 <123@-.com> Gave us:
>On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 06:59:29 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs
><roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 05:43:51 GMT, 123 <123@-.com> Gave us:
>>
>>>DVD never had such limitations on it which is why its so popular.
>>
>>
>> DVD was never resolved so much that the studios cared. Now, they do.
>>Also, the means was not available then as it is now.
>
>You have no idea.
I most certainly do so. I remember them saying they cared, but
didn't see much other than macrovision utilized. MPEG2 was already in
place and is encrypted by default.
> Before dvd there was something called vhs with macro
>copy protection which was also placed on dvd along with other copy
>protection.
No shit? Wow, you spew something NOT new every day.
>> Get a clue.
>>
>> Leave to a rip off retard to make such a stupid remark. You are that
>>retard.
>
>Fact remains the new copy protection does not look like it will be
>cracked and even if it is it can be stopped pretty quickly.
It will not likely ever be cracked. It is quite deep with even only
one key, and in several months, the key, and schema can be slightly
altered so as to make even the best hack reverse engineer crypto twit
start writing suicide notes. There can even be false keys included in
the stream to further thwart those that think "they'll get around
this, just like they did the others". It ain't so.I said so years
ago, and I am right. As the datagram gets bigger, it leads to higher
bit rates, and higher bit rates means that bigger keys, and deeper
crypto schemas can be used. You turkeys won't be getting by these any
time soon, if ever in your lifetime. Remember the "fool me once..."
sayings?
One of the biggest businesses in the country today is security.
Try to pull some shit in Vegas. You'll learn that the shit you pull
in Vegas will mean that your ass will stay in vegas...
... for the duration of a prison term.
Security will win long before anarchistic twits ever will.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|