|
|
Posted by PTravel on 06/30/06 16:50
"Mr. Tapeguy" <mr.tapeguy@pro-tape.com> wrote in message
news:1151654387.875535.315710@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
>>
>> That question is best answered by the pros in rec.video.production. I
>> suspect the GL2 _may_ suffice, but the reviews that I've seen of it
>> aren't
>> that good. Most "entry level wedding videographer" recommendations that
>> I've seen have been for a PD-150/170 (or the prosumer equivalent, the
>> VX2000/2100). Next up the ladder is the XL2, which offers the advantage
>> of
>> interchangeable lenses but, from what I understand, offers video quality
>> comparable to the Sony offering. Sony's big advantage is extraordinary
>> low-light capability -- I can shoot by candlelight with my VX2000 -- and,
>> evidently, that makes it appealing to wedding videographers who have to
>> shoot in dimly lit churches, at night, etc. I've honestly never seen the
>> GL2 discussed in this context, though I suspect it probably wouldn't be
>> too
>> bad (though check its low-light capability). The GL1, on the other hand,
>> from what I've seen is pretty bad.
>>
>>
>
> Ah shaddap ya pompous blowhard ; >
>
> Craig
Yeah, the nerve of me -- actually providing information!
>
> http://www.pro-tape.com
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|