|
|
Posted by PTravel on 07/03/06 01:21
"Mike Kujbida" <kujfamNoSpam@xplornet.com> wrote in message
news:4gr2lgF1nscokU1@individual.net...
>
> PTravel wrote:
>>
>> The more resolution, the closer you'll be able to zoom in. Since
>> you're using a variety of source image sizes, you should vary the
>> scan resolution to produce an image that is as close as possible to
>> 4,000 x 4,000 pixels, which is the maximum that Premiere Pro will
>> accept. Also, make sure that your scanner's maximum resolution is
>> optical and not interpolated.
>
>
> I sure hope Premiere doesn't have the same issue with a lot of large image
> files that Vegas does.
> If I was to try and load over 100 images at a res of 4K each, I'd
> definitely
> bring my machine to it's knees in a hurry.
> IMO, there's no good reason to scan at such a high resolution. YMMV.
Premiere chews up memory, but I've found that, with 1gig, it runs just fine.
Even when I was editing with only half that, the program was still pretty
responsive. What dragged it down was the length of the timeline, rather
than the number of stills or other video that had to be rendered. Once the
still has been rendered, it's not a factor.
>
> Mike
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|