|
|
Posted by NoNoBadDog! on 07/07/06 00:09
"P Darby" <DontUseThisEmail@All.com> wrote in message
news:12an6tprgbve6fe@corp.supernews.com...
> "NoNoBadDog!" <Diespammers@notme.com> wrote in message
> news:a9WdnXqr_sok7jrZnZ2dnUVZ_uqdnZ2d@hawaiiantel.net...
>
>> You are wasting your time. Any video you take without the doctors
>> knowledge will *NOT* be admissible as evidence in court. In order to do
>> so, the videotaping would have to be ordered by a district court judge,
>> would have to be accomplished by trained personnel, and the video would
>> have to be maintained in law enforcements hands at all times to insure
>> that the video had not been altered.
>
>
> What rubbish.
> The police are asking hunt monitors to video the hunt scum, to get
> evidence of them illegally hunting.
> Of course it's admissible.
>
> Pete
>
Not according to any jurisdiction that I know of.
Perhaps you have a legal precedent you would like to cite where such a video
was used to convict anyone?
Bobby
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|