|
|
Posted by NoNoBadDog! on 10/05/12 11:52
"Anne R" <no@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97FBF157EDF215D4AM2@127.0.0.1...
> On 02 Jul 2006, NoNoBadDog!<Diespammers@notme.com> wrote:
>
>> "Anne R" <no@nomail.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns97F3C793C66874C1H4@127.0.0.1...
>>> [...]
>>
>> You are wasting your time. Any video you take without the doctors
>> knowledge will *NOT* be admissible as evidence in court. In order
>> to do so, the videotaping would have to be ordered by a district
>> court judge, would have to be accomplished by trained personnel,
>> and the video would have to be maintained in law enforcements hands
>> at all times to insure that the video had not been altered.
>>
>
> It is not necessary for the video evidence to be used in a civil action
> in the courts.
>
> I do not expect it to go so far.
Then what purpose would it serve?
Bobby
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|