|
|
Posted by Laurence Payne on 07/11/06 17:58
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:39:49 -0500, "Nigel Brooks" <nbrooks@msn.com>
wrote:
>The whole point of my post is that the legality of a covert consensual
>recording depends entirely on the jurisdiction you are in and there is no
>blanket authorization or prohibition.
If it's consensual, how is it covert?
Anyway, this has gone on long enough. I just 'phoned my father, a
lawyer. Covert audio/video is admissible in English courts. Given
opportunity, the defence may well challenge its authenticity. But in
principle it's admissible, and it's often used.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|