|
|
Posted by PTravel on 07/16/06 08:18
"Martin Heffels" <spamalam@worldhello.com> wrote in message
news:cfrjb252qgo7tiabuo7069r2m1b4h1isl9@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 16:41:29 GMT, "PTravel" <ptravel@travelersvideo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>My software (Premiere Pro 1.5) displays frames, not fields. I look at
>>frames in the context of choosing transition and cut points, creating
>>titles, and when compositing.
>
> OK. Then in your case you would be able to see frames where information is
> copied from a previous frame. Also some systems show on playback only 1
> field to improve playback speed on the computerscreen ("realtime-ness"),
> which would lead to a possibility of missing that copied field.
I'm also looking at these things on two actual television monitors -- a 9"
JVC broadcast monitor and a 19" Toshiba television (the latter has less
accurate color -- I use it to get a sense of how it will look on my friends'
televisions). My computer monitor has its gamma adjusted for Photoshop, so
it makes a pretty lousy video monitor. The kind of banding errors described
in the article should be pretty noticeable on the 19", as should copied
fields.
>
> -m-
> --
> "I'm full of dust and guitars." - Syd Barrett
> 07/07/06 The Crazy Diamond is now a star in heaven
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|