|
|
Posted by PJ on 07/17/06 19:45
"Peter Harding" <harding@herald.ox.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.1f25be1fe8e76aa9896bd@zing...
> In article <YISdnaEpQMWr9ybZnZ2dnUVZ8qWdnZ2d@brightview.com>, dinsddy74
> @hotmail.com says...
>> He should have stayed where he was as the movie was pants.
>
> I fear as much. As someone who feels the 1978 Christopher Reeve film is
> one of the all-time greatest superhero films ever made, I guess I'm even
> more likely to be bitterly disappointed with this new one?
>
> The Geoffrey Unsworth bright outdoor slightly-smoky glass filming...
> oooh.... might be time to watch Zardoz again (if she'll let me).
i too am a lover of the original and parts of II and i gotta say returns was
excellent, the 1st time i saw it was at the imax in 3d,totally sold out to
people who were there to see "superman return" and that really was
something special! i got a lump in my throat during the plane sequence, that
really is what imax and 3d was made for it was definetly a "holy sh*t, now
THAT was superman in action" was like a seeing it again for the 1st time
moment.
2nd time was in a multiplex full of people who didnt seem to give a sh*t no
emotion towards the movie etc. just lots of people fiddling with mobiles and
talking (OT rant- are people not taught cinema ettiquette anymore? i was
brought up to keep quiet and if i really need to talk just whisper!) i would
certainly recommend a trip to the imax to see it, just for the huge screen
it is worth the trip (i had to go to london from brum but it is now being
shown in manchester too) and the 3d bits are the icing on the cake
overall i would say if u like the old supes u should like the new, but if
its just another movie 2 u u may find it a bit long and nonsensical as i
overheard some dumbass woman in a dudley multiplex say " what's it about?
what does he do? ahhh doh nowe supahmon"
PJ
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|