|
Posted by GMAN on 07/18/06 01:25
In article <mtMug.6823$5K2.4862@fed1read03>, WinField <doghouse@operamail.com> wrote:
>
>Invid Fan wrote:
>> In article <4_rug.6784$5K2.2724@fed1read03>, WinField
>> <doghouse@operamail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Reggie Dunbar wrote:
>>>
>>>>So they will clean up movies to show on an airplane, but stock the shelves
>>>>with unrated versions. Hmm. Clearly they're allowed to "edit their art"
>>>>either direction when they get the money.
>>>>
>>>
>>>It's all about making money.
>>> The studios arent' sueing T.V. networks for "editing" their precious
>>>"works of art" to fit time slots. Time slots ARE religious icons, and
>>>MUST NOT BE TAMPERED WITH.
>>>
>>> These "time slots" create cash-flows, after all.
>>>
>>
>> The tv networks have paid for the right to do this. If the DVD
>> sanitizers also pay a fee....
>
>Hmmm, even more gold into their monstrous coffers.
>Is this good on balance. NOT !
>
> The studios are making money hand-over-fist already. Are they happy?
> I think not ... the more they make, the more loco & rabid they become
>over "lost" revenues. These crazed savages are experiencing what used
>to be called ... GOLD FEVER.
>
> They want me, goyim that I am, to give up some precious personal
>rights and freedoms to help them control their fever. They expect me to
>run my personal life and home as if it was some corporation. As if it
>was some merchantile exchange that the money-changers presume to rule over.
>
> In my home, a movie screenplay or script may cause happiness, magic
>or pain. But it certainly isn't some sacred object - even if Hollywood
>insists it must be.
>
They dont give a kosher rats ass if you take the movie and sanitize it in the
privacy of your own home, what they do care about is some goody two shoes self
rightous polygamist sect taking the movies, editing them and selling them to
customers without due compensation or permission of the copywrite holders.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|