|
|
Posted by nenslo on 10/07/93 11:53
In article <1153435264.591067.116140@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
"Rev. James Slaughter" <prairie.squidman@gmail.com> wrote:
> nenslo wrote:
> > In article <12bu8u59kaj1ldb@corp.supernews.com>,
> > Alric Knebel <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > I meant lines, not sentences, sorry.
> > >
> > > Let me get this straight: You thought this was clever?
> >
> > Just stating a fact, not putting on a big show like you.
>
> I think that counting words would be a better idea, since sentances can
> be stretched and stretched beyond belief; with enough punctuation and
> idiocy, something that I have a good abundance of belive you me (and
> you do, of course, I won't forget the "lesson" you taught me), it could
> just go on forever and you'd be pointing out that it was still good
> since this post would still have a 1:1 and yet it has a much, much
> higher word ratio and hey - wasn't some writer able to write a hundred
> twenty page sentence?
Shut up.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|