|
Posted by doc on 10/22/68 11:53
certaintly not going to disagree with that but the whole 1080i is a push to
move more electronics. how good does one need to get? after all 720 lines
are one hot looking picture and great to watch even 550 or so and there in a
switch to 1080 would be clearly visible but 720 to 1080 wasn't and that was
what we wanted to prove to many of our clients who even though we do SD 720
work for them were getting hype that HD is better . . sure but who cares if
the picture they're looking at is absolutely fabulous already :o)
DrD
"Pat Horridge" <pat@remove-spam.vet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:e9ilp8$cm0$1$830fa7a5@news.demon.co.uk...
>
> "doc" <doc@anywhere.com> wrote in message
> news:I7ktg.3278$hb3.2820@trndny04...
> SNIP
>> now if your talking HD perhaps it's a different story . . however . .
>> just two weeks ago we sat two monitors of identical types in a mall,
>> played SD 16 x 9, 600+ lines on one monitor and HD 1080i on the other and
>> surveyed over 800 people and less than 4% could truly indentify the
>> actual difference by image description to conclude the HD picture. don't
>> get me wrong, about half said that the HD was better but the other half
>> said the SD 700 was SNIP
>
> It does of course depend on the quality of the two monitors used. They may
> have been the same but were they both capable of showing the full quality
> of HD 1080i? Most LCD and Plasmas currently can't as their native
> resolution is less than 1920X1080
> If it was a CRT then it needs to be big to see the benefit.
> So although current consumer display devices don't show 1080i off to it's
> best that will change and making calls on quality required based on what
> can be seen today won't be valid in a year or two.
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|