|
|
Posted by Phat Bytestard on 08/11/06 04:21
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:27:29 -0500, JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> Gave
us:
>On 2006-07-31, Phat Bytestard <phatbytestard@getinmahharddrive.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:12:27 -0400, Derek Janssen
>><ejanss@nospam.comcast.net> Gave us:
>>
>>>Maybe HD's are a little "neater" than DVD's, but they ain't the quantum
>>>leap to make us turn against DVD's like a pack of jackals--
>>>Remember CD's and vinyl, or word processors and typewriters: To become
>>>a "replacement" technology, the new gizmo has to make you *LOATHE AND
>>>DESPISE* the old technology...
>>
>> Total crap.
>>
>> 6 times the resolution IS a quantum leap. You (obviously) and other
>> folks just have not realized that fact yet.
>
> The $1000 question is whether or not you are willing to spend
>$1000 to experience that difference?
You're a fucking retard. Baseball cards cost twenty times what they
cost back in the seventies. Consumer electronics is cheap, and would
be at twice the price in some cases.
> That's not even getting into the
>issues of whether or not everything that needs to go into that
>superior experience (including perhaps some more rather expensive
>new hardware) have all put themselves into alignment.
You need to align your brain. You spew utter CRAP, and then try to
pass the stench off as a flowery breeze.
>
> I can get TWO regular progressive scan DVD players for just
>the cost of a CABLE to connect an expensive HD dvd player to an
>expensive HD TV that can fully exploit each other.
You're an idiot. One, for looking at overtly expensive patch cords,
and two, for buying shitbox DVD players and attempting to pass them
off on us as "good" simply because they are "progressive scan".
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|