|
|
Posted by ushere on 09/22/06 10:03
Spex wrote:
> ushere wrote:
>> FCP User wrote:
>>> In article <vWDPg.991$5i7.415@newsreading01.news.tds.net>,
>>> Ray S <mail@mail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> yubbers9@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I heard that a flash file can be locked so that
>>>>> no one can open it and steal the contents.
>>>>> Can I convert a video to flash format to
>>>>> protect it? I am assuming that 99% of the
>>>>> people out there are not using frame-grabbing
>>>>> software.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>> Flash video can be streamed, meaning that people will have to jump
>>>> through a few hoops. If you make the assumption that most people
>>>> really don't know, or can't be bothered, then yes, flash video is a
>>>> good way to protect your files.
>>>
>>> I just wish the Flash folks had followed everyone else in the planet
>>> and impmented an H-264 variant instead of mucking about with YET
>>> ANOTHER niche codec.
>>>
>>> Yeah, I know On2Vp6 is supposed to have some nice attributes, but I'm
>>> sick and tired of trying to support a zillion variants for client
>>> delivery of internet video.
>>>
>>> It's hard enough making excellent video. Then to discover you have to
>>> spend so much more time trying to put it into a format that "works"
>>> for the great unwashed BROWSER/LMS/PDA/CELPHONE/WHATEVER audience is a
>>> royal pain.
>>>
>>> I'm starting to long for the crappy old VHS days.
>>>
>>> At least once the work was done you knew what to do with it and you
>>> knew that once you did, ANYBODY could see it.
>>>
>>> Sheesh.
>>>
>> here, here!
>>
>> vegas user ;-]
>
> Just use QT!!
>
> Seriously, unless the video needs to be embedded in an interactive
> application a la Flash I steer towards QT. I like the uncluttered
> minimalist footprint of the QT web plugin.
>
> HD DVD vs Blu-Ray looks a flash in the pan compared to the WMV vs Real
> vs QT vs Flash that shows no sign of reaching a consensus...ever.
>
> FCP User (recent convert) :-)
from what?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|