|
Posted by Quanta on 09/23/06 03:26
"Jukka Aho" <jukka.aho@iki.fi> wrote in message
news:%E1Rg.18136$DE1.1192@reader1.news.jippii.net...
> Quanta wrote:
>
>>>> I have seen absolutely no 'standard' gammas like you claim.
>>>> Enlighten me.
>
>>> <http://google.com/search?q=mac+pc+gamma>
>>> <http://google.com/groups?q=mac+pc+gamma>
>>>
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_correction#PC.2C_Ma
>>> c.2C_and_sRGB_standard_gammas>
>
>> Averages? Do you know statistics?
>
> I have no idea what you're going on about and why, but it seems like
> you're looking for an argument. You'll get none from me; I merely provided
> you with the basic information you requested, and I think I'll leave it at
> that.
>
> --
> znark
>
As I said, none of this takes into account any source of variability. These
standards are false.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|