|
|
Posted by Joshua Zyber on 10/10/06 23:07
<mv@movingvision.co.uk> wrote in message
news:I49b1FL1R$KFFwtJ@movingvision.demon.co.uk...
> The fact is that PAL is hugely better quality than NTSC in all the
> important facets including resolution, chroma fidelity and bandwidth
> without the gated correction overlays that NTSC can't live without.
The fact is that PAL cannot play film-based theatrical movies without
SPEEDING THEM UP 4%. That's a fact.
PAL is an *incremental* improvement in resolution, chroma, and
bandwidth, at the expense of having to watch your movies with the actors
speaking in chipmunk voices. Both formats are left in the dust by High
Definition. Debating whether PAL is better than NTSC is kind of like
debating whether slop tastes better than gruel when there's a thick,
juicy steak on the next plate over.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|