|
|
Posted by JoeBloe on 10/11/06 03:58
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:28:26 +0100, Roderick Stewart
<escapetime@removethisbit.beeb.net> Gave us:
>On 10 Oct 2006 06:32:38 +0200, Martin Heffels
><feipbjszfo@oxeszdjnlp.xercdpvueppjtmougcqvtz.net> wrote:
>
>>> You got the math 100% ass backwards, dumbass. Cinemas are at 24fps,
>>>which is SLOWER, not faster.
>>
>>Do you know that cinema's project at 48fps and even 72fps (with double or
>>triple shutter), to avoid image-flicker? I don't think you do, or else you
>>wouldn't call me dumbass :-P
>
>You don't get a new picture every 1/48 or 1/72 of a second though, it
>just repeats the same picture two or three times.
>
Bingo! The only "flicker" that is reduced is lamp/shutter flicker.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|