|
|
Posted by carlmart on 11/01/06 15:19
> For DV-camera's that is true, but for HDV, this was known, as it is the
> follow-up for the indie-filmmaker/doco-maker.
I was involved in the several forums on the discussions over HDV, and
that was not completely clear. For me it always was. I saw DV as what
16mm was to film, and HDV as super-16.
> That's just baloney to think that 24p makes your footage allof a sudden
> look film-like. It's a lot more thingks which count to that, and those
> things are usually the ones neglected first at a low-budget movie.
Baloney is to use 24p effect. What I am talking about is shooting with
real 24 frames to be transferred to film. I don't care for the effect
and Sony try to cheat (and I was present at a show release) saying the
Z1 also was 24p.
The JVC and the Canon seem to be the real 24p in the HDV world, with
the HVX200 closing by. Sony is now to release the V1, which apparently
has real 24p.
In any case you can use the Z1 in 50i and start transfer to film from
there. It's longer, but you can still use the Z1 (which is what I plan
to do). The Z1 is still more affordable and more versatile than the
other two.
> I know many people who bought a XL1 for that reason. But the amount of
> poepl who actually have an additional lens, is almost zilch.
This is also pushing for better lens quality. You also need to know how
to work with fixed lenses, and not everybody can do that.
> Video is dirt-cheap nowadays. Do you really expect that a fully loaded
> HD-camera will be your's for under a 1000? Don't think so.
No, but I think we should avoid tale-telling how you shot your film. Or
it may become a distraction.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|