|  | Posted by PTravel on 11/03/06 19:53 
"Citizen Bob" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message news:454b8d1c.8275828@news-server.houston.rr.com...
 > On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 09:16:59 -0800, "PTravel"
 > <ptravel@travelersvideo.com> wrote:
 >
 >>> A vague law does not bind.
 >
 >>It's not a vague law.  The law says: no unauthorized copying,
 >>distribution,
 >>preparation of derivative works, public performance or public display.
 >>Nothing vague about that.
 >
 > That is not what's meant by a vague law. A vague law is one where a
 > significant number of people do not obey it because they don't
 > understand it.
 
 There is a constitutional vagueness standard that would invalidate, and
 render unenforceable, a law that does not comply.  The relevant sections of
 the Copyright Act are not unconstitutionally vague.
 
 >
 >>That's true.  Worse, however, is that the entertainment industry is using
 >>its wealth to buy laws that are contrary to the underlying rationale of
 >>Article I, Section 8 and the First Amendment.
 >
 > Those laws are illegitimate, and therefore do not bind.
 
 The relevant sections of the Copyright Act are not "illegitimate" as a
 matter of law.  As such, they are binding.
 
 >
 >>> The Milgram Experiments prove that most
 >>> people need to obey authorities even when they are wrong. I do not let
 >>> the Mob tell me what to do.
 >
 >>Be sure to call me when you get sued, then. ;)
 >
 > It would be a colossal waste of time to sue me because I don't break
 > any law.
 
 Then you have nothing to worry about.
 
 > The Mob has mininterpreted the law and someday Congress will
 > stop taking bribes and do something to rectify the situation.
 
 I agree that Congress taking bribes to pass laws (and that is exactly what
 lobbyists do) is a serious problem, probably one of the most serious
 problems facing this country.  However, as long as the laws it passes comply
 with Constitutional, they are legitimate and enforceable.
 
 >
 >
 > --
 >
 > "First and last, it's a question of money. Those men who own the earth
 > make the laws to protect what they have. They fix up a sort of fence or
 > pen around what they have, and they fix the law so the fellow on the
 > outside cannot get in. The laws are really organized for the protection of
 > the men who rule the world. They were never organized or enforced to do
 > justice. We have no system for doing justice, not the slightest in the
 > world."
 > --Clarence Darrow
  Navigation: [Reply to this message] |