|
Posted by Citizen Bob on 11/06/06 21:17
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:47:46 GMT, Paul Hyett
<pah@nojunkmailplease.co.uk> wrote:
>>It was not legitimate unless it had the consent of the governed, which
>>it obviously did not.
>Was it not ratified by the necessary number of States?
That does not represent the consent of the governed.
Only a jury of one's peers can decide the consent of the governed.
--
"First and last, it's a question of money. Those men who own the earth
make the laws to protect what they have. They fix up a sort of fence or
pen around what they have, and they fix the law so the fellow on the
outside cannot get in. The laws are really organized for the protection of
the men who rule the world. They were never organized or enforced to do
justice. We have no system for doing justice, not the slightest in the world."
--Clarence Darrow
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|