|
|
Posted by JerrySmith'sTightEnd on 11/09/06 18:05
"Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:whJ4h.84$ZT3.29@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com...
>
>
> --
> This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
>
> http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
> "JerrySmith'sTightEnd" <jhgfjh@hjhg.com> wrote in message
> news:KxG4h.40$yE6.10@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
>>
>> "Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote in message
>> news:B9z4h.7318$9v5.6346@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
>>>
>>> http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
>>> "Jim Gilliland" <usemylastname@cheerful.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4552a256$0$32406$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
>>>> Randy Yates wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> S/PDIF is a single-wire interface that embeds the clock with the data.
>>>>> Because of this, problems with the interface that aren't serious
>>>>> enough to cause bit errors can still affect the sound by affecting the
>>>>> quality of the recovered clock. A PLL is used to recover the clock,
>>>>> and depending on the type of loop filter used in the PLL, input noise
>>>>> from cable degradations could introduce jitter into the digital clock
>>>>> and thus the reconstructed analog signal.
>>>>>
>>>>> How audible is it? That is a whole dissertation unto its own.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed. That's why I focused on his remarks about volume and bass.
>>>> Modern equipment does a pretty good job of recovering the clock,
>>>> though. It wasn't always true.
>>>>
>>>> I can't help but wonder if this guy isn't just a troll - it's hard to
>>>> imagine anyone believing this kind of garbage. Then again, there's an
>>>> awful lot of snake oil on the market. Someone must be buying it -
>>>> perhaps we've just discovered who that is. <g>
>>>>
>>>> I'd suggest a good double blind test, but I doubt that he'd accept the
>>>> results. He seems pretty fixed on his delusion.
>>>
>>> See son, you are biased without even giving it a try for yourself. I
>>> would not waste my time if it were not true. Try the shit(with cables
>>> of your choice) and see if you hear or see a difference. First, you
>>> have to know what you are dealing with before you try and figure out
>>> what you are supposed to hear or see.
>>
>> Dang, getting a bit bitter? And now those who disagree are "son", a
>> putdown implying you are somehow older, wiser and more experienced? You
>> have no training in engineering or technical matters, but act like your
>> 15 years of using consumer electronics mkes you an expert.
>
> Who needs to be 'trained' but a dog? My 15 years of high resolution video
> and a little over 20 years total experience with strict attention to
> detail and flawless testing does make me an expert. I have dealt with
> many different brand of a high end nature buddy. If you want to get
> technical, then you are not dealing with the real world experience, only
> the technical - which very few actually see.
You really are an ignorant little twit. That's obvious from your
"sponsored" posts for your lame business (do the makers of that software
allow you to sell those programs without retail packaging? Maybe MS will
let you know son!). Do you think your ads are enticing any of us to deal
with you?
Your disdain for education is the mark of the uneducated. Luckily there are
some technical folks out here, since you wouldn't be using any of that
equipment otherwise. You are an expert only in your own myopic eyes...ever
consider, even just a little bit, that others out here might be correct?
You're a video game playing, rap-listening, star wars watching social retard
who has a misguided belief in his own superiority...I'll bet the only reason
you're not known and beloved by the masses is ether because you know (a)
you're too smart and they're jealous, or (b) it's a conspiracy by whitey.
>
> Imagine getting technical about driving a car. Imagine getting technical
> about having with your girl(guy?). Imagine getting technical about your
> dinner. If you did, you would be very lonely, miserable and insane!
Stay relevant, you silly little bitch!
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> You say that I am delusional, but how come I see scratches on the film
>>> when I saw none with the generic? How come details are brighter,
>>> cleaner and earth materials look as they should? Don't knock it until
>>> you try it. What you have written is similar to a cocksucker who has
>>> never had pussy. You look at porn seeing pussy and imagining what it is
>>> like from reading about it and looking at it, but hands-on experience so
>>> very different from you 'education' from reading.
>>
>> It seems you're getting back to talking about analog signal cables, which
>> can make a marginal diference. If you're talking about differences with
>> digital signal cables, you're retarded. Your continued fascination with
>> homo-erotic imagery reveals thingsabout your personality, none of which
>> have anything to do with the discussion. But hey, if you like that sort
>> of thing, there's nothng wrong with that.
>>
>
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|