|
|
Posted by JerrySmith'sTightEnd on 11/09/06 18:06
"Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:SmJ4h.86$ZT3.64@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com...
>
>
> --
> This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
>
> http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
> "Richard" <rfeirste@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:12l6abk70q67n5a@corp.supernews.com...
>>A tech guy from HDMI, LLC., has posted on the web that 1080p/60 is more
>>demanding but that even low end cables up to 3 meters have been tested in
>>their lab and have been more than satisfactory. For longer lengths they
>>recommend better (but not expensive) cables or better yet, an HDMI
>>booster.
>>
>> My cheap, but solid built, HDMI and DVI cables work just fine, but I have
>> had no experience with 1080p/60.
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>
> See, if you are happy, then so am I. However, I decided to take a risk
> and the risk paid off. Again, only if you are what they call a videophile
> will you will look for, expect and find a difference. The average person
> who just sees a 'clear' picture will accept just that - nothing more.
And if you're a videofool you'll see nonexistent differences and brag about
them to others.
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|