|
|
Posted by Guest on 11/09/06 22:50
--
This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
"Tom Stiller" <tomstiller@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:tomstiller-A72927.17232609112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <gqedndhmAvLhPc7YnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
> "Art Landy" <artlandy@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> "Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote in message
>> news:5Su4h.2897$IR4.629@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
>> >
>> > http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
>> > "David" <davey@home.net> wrote in message
>> > news:8cidnbp8zKKn6M_YnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> >> "Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote The AR outperformed the Monster
>> >> to
>> >> a very larger degree.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> As brilliant and renowned engineer Henry Kloss, et al, turn over in
>> >> their grave . . .
>> >>
>> >
>> > Ahh shit.
>> >
>> What a spicy thread! Can't resist putting in my two cents. The arguments
>> seems to be the ususal "Subjectivists vs the Objectivists" type and both
>> tend to adhere strongly to their positions. It is hard to convince a
>> subjectivist that their experience is valid but flawed in the resulting
>> conclusions. And itis hard to convince an Objectivists that the
>> subjectivists aren't full of crap!
>
> No, the argument is about lack of understanding about digital
> representation of analog signals and their subsequent over bit-serial
> pathways. One side thinks that minor degradation of the digital signal
> will be reflected in the reconstructed analog waveform (which his sharp
> eyes and eyes can detect). The other side understands digital signal
> processing, error correcting codes, and transmission lines.
>
> --
> Tom Stiller
>
The other side only understands what they have been told can only be done.
Do you think that these cable companies(way over-priced ones and lower
priced ones) just happen to make digital cables at a higher quality just for
the hell of it? Do you think they just decided to make them without
research and development? Get real.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|