|
|
Posted by JerrySmith'sTightEnd on 11/10/06 04:40
"Art Landy" <artlandy@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gqedndhmAvLhPc7YnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> What a spicy thread! Can't resist putting in my two cents. The arguments
> seems to be the ususal "Subjectivists vs the Objectivists" type and both
> tend to adhere strongly to their positions. It is hard to convince a
> subjectivist that their experience is valid but flawed in the resulting
> conclusions. And itis hard to convince an Objectivists that the
> subjectivists aren't full of crap!
An interesting observation, but not entirely accurate in this thread. Some
of the differences in analog cables and other technology (like the great
tube vs. solid state debate) can actually have scientific bases...but just
how they work in te real world is a matter of opinion, which I'm happy to be
subjective about. This guest tool can't even make up a scientific rationale
for this crap.
> "Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote in message
> news:5Su4h.2897$IR4.629@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
>>
>>
>> --
>> This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
>>
>> http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
>> "David" <davey@home.net> wrote in message
>> news:8cidnbp8zKKn6M_YnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> "Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote The AR outperformed the Monster to
>>> a very larger degree.
>>>
>>>
>>> As brilliant and renowned engineer Henry Kloss, et al, turn over in
>>> their grave . . .
>>>
>>
>> Ahh shit.
>>
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|