|
Posted by Leonard Caillouet on 11/10/06 15:56
"Jim Gilliland" <usemylastname@cheerful.com> wrote in message
news:45547afc$0$17686$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
> Art Landy wrote:
>> What a spicy thread! Can't resist putting in my two cents. The arguments
>> seems to be the ususal "Subjectivists vs the Objectivists" type and both
>> tend to adhere strongly to their positions. It is hard to convince a
>> subjectivist that their experience is valid but flawed in the resulting
>> conclusions. And itis hard to convince an Objectivists that the
>> subjectivists aren't full of crap!
>
> I wish that were true. The single "subjectivist" here doesn't seem to be
> able to support his position at all.
>
> I could easily quote you many of the arguments of the subjectivists, even
> though I certainly fall more into the objectivist camp. The problem here
> is that the original poster can't even put together a coherent discussion
> of the topic. It appears that we are (as the saying goes) "engaging in a
> battle of wits with an unarmed man".
What is amazing is that so much effort has been devoted to this thread.
Leonard
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 16978 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter for free now!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|