|
|
Posted by Guest on 11/10/06 19:48
--
This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
"JerrySmith'sTightEnd" <jhgfjh@hjhg.com> wrote in message
news:D525h.8050$9v5.1108@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>
> "Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote in message
> news:ao15h.6606$yl4.2287@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>>
>>
> SNIP
>
>>> You don't even begin to understand the technical concept of compression,
>>> whether digital or analog.
>>
>> I know, only you have such knowledge.
>
> Many of us have that knowledge. Many more don't, but they have the good
> sense not to pretend they know it. You lack any form of logic or
> technical knowledge, yet you fancy yourself an expert based on your
> experience as a user of mid-grade consumer electroincs for the last 15-20
> years.
Not a 'technical' expert, but a real world technical expert and an expert on
use different technolgies.
>
>>>
>>> Never heard a difference unless the cable was bad.
>>
>> Did even have different cables and testes them? Or are you just wanting
>> to not be wrong?
>
> I've used many cables in different situations and have encountered bad and
> or damaged ones. Now as for "testes", I don't rub the cables up against
> my sack. Once again, you seem to have a real thing for sexual contact
> with men, but that's your deal.
Lol! Now that was something that was actually funny! Sorry for trying to
type faster than I can...
Now, all you have in your mind are bad or damaged cables, but nothing about
them being different(for different makers) while not being damaged.
>
>>
>>>>
>>>> It may also help keep that light tighter also.
>>>
>>> Electro magnetic shielding has no effect on optical signals. And you
>>> obviously have no idea how light from a coherent source propagates down
>>> a glass fiber.
>>
>> Who said 'elector-magnetic' shielding? Are tints on cars the same?
>
> You're the one who brought up shielding. And no, you fucking moron,
> tinted windows are not the same.
>
How well will that optical cable work without shielding?
>>>> One of the beauties of optical transport is
>>>>> that no
>>>>> such interferences are possible. Hence there is no need for
>>>>> "shielding".
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, I know you didn't mention it, but I've seen optical cables that
>>>>> were
>>>>> "superior" because they had "gold connectors".
>>>>
>>>> You know what. Now that you mention it, the thin black one has a
>>>> plastic connector and th AR was gold. I think the monster was plasticv
>>>> also. See, maybe it does have osmething to do with it.
>>>
>>> Gold REALLY effects light!
>>
>> I don't know the fine details of the cable, but the AR cable is doing
>> something right. I can tell that you never tested these cabes as you
>> never admitted it, you just assumed that it is what it is. I once
>> thought as you do. However, I am not one to dismiss anything without
>> trying it for myself first. You keep telling me no, but you never tested
>> anything. Such arrogance.
>
>
> Please, go test gravity from a great height. After all, it's only the
> scientists who say you'll splatter all over the pavement. What the hell
> do they know!?
You seem to have the mindset of a homicidal maniac!
>
>>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|