You are here: Re: Youtube copyright infringements are not all bad for the copyright holders? « Video Production « DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Re: Youtube copyright infringements are not all bad for the copyright holders?

Posted by Skip on 12/05/06 21:17

"PTravel" <ptravel@travelersvideo.com> wrote in message
news:4tltu5F14ems0U1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "Skip" <shadowcatcher@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:ro3dh.3$%T6.0@newsfe15.phx...
>> "Colin B" <Colin B@cb.org> wrote in message
>> news:4573e69e$1@clear.net.nz...
>>> Now that it's easy to put your digital photographs and movies on to a
>>> video sharing site, such as "youtube", the question of whether copyright
>>> infringements really harm the copyright holders is now a hot topic. See,
>>> for example, the article titled:
>>>
>>> Youtube copyright infringements are not all bad for the copyright
>>> holders?
>>>
>>> http://fredhere.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>> What do you think of the arguments in this blog? Should copyright
>>> holders take a broad view and tolerate copyright infringements on
>>> youtube as is suggested in this blog?
>>>
>>> See also the youtube site: http://www.youtube.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Only if proper attribution is given by the person who posts the
>> copyrighted material. And, then, copyright infringement is arguable, at
>> that point.
>
> Sorry, but that's absolutely, completely wrong. Attribution is irrelevant
> to infringement, except that if you acknowledge the copyright owner when
> you infringe, you've rendered yourself liable for intentional
> infringement.
>
>> Too often, material is put up without attribution, and there's no way for
>> the viewer to hunt down and purchase the original, if so inclined.
>
> Doesn't matter. There is absolutely no obligation on the part of a
> copyright owner to make his work of authorship available for others' use
> or purchase. "I didn't know who owned it" is not a defense to copyright
> infringement.
>
>>

You misunderstand me. I was only commenting on when it might be acceptable
to the owner of a copyright, or when infringement may be beneficial to the
holder. Not a comment on the overall acceptability. I've had images posted
by others and demanded, as a matter of principle, that they be removed.

--
Skip Middleton
www.shadowcatcherimagery.com
www.pbase.com/skipm

 

Navigation:

[Reply to this message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"