|
|
Posted by Bob Quintal on 12/20/06 00:08
"Colin B" <Colin B@cb.org> wrote in
news:458825a5$1@clear.net.nz:
>
> "Bill Funk" <BigBill@there.com> wrote in message
> news:6s0go29f2kik25ras5ieji29to2modqjav@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 03:23:24 GMT,
>> "blahblah_nospam@sbcglobal.net"
>> <EDM_spamblock_@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Anyone who's spent more than a few minutes on YouTube,
>>>MySpace, Google Videos etc knows that nearly everything
>>>posted is home brewed and doesn't violate any commercial
>>>copyright.
>>
>> I just now went to youtube, and of the four videos listed on
>> the top of the page (under "Director Videos"), three were
>> very obviously of copyrighted material.
>> --
>> Bill Funk
>> replace "g" with "a"
>
> On this site:
> http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/21/youtubes-magic-number-15-
b
> illion/
>
> it says that:
>
> "These 100 million daily video views aren't people watching
> kittens fall asleep. Most of the popular videos on YouTube
> contain copyrighted material that YouTube shouldn't be
> presenting in the first place. This isn't just music videos
> and Saturday Night Live skits - if music is playing in the
> background while someone is dancing around, that's still
> copyright infringement. "
Bu!!$#!t, that's fair use.
--
Bob Quintal
PA is y I've altered my email address.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|