|
Posted by Danne on 12/31/06 08:47
"Mike Kujbida" <kujfamNoSpam@xplornet.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:4vnb17F1ckulrU1@mid.individual.net...
Removed...
>> I have noted that ADVC-300 has a dip-switch that you can set it to
>> ratio 16:9 or 4:3. What about ADVC-110, can it capture in 16:9 too
>> ?
>
>
> Don't see why not. All of these devices simply transcode a signal
> from
> analog to digital (or vice-versa) so it shouldn't make any
> difference what's
> fed into it.
> My suspicion is that the switch on the ADVC-300 does the conversion
> from 4:3
> to 16:9 for you.
The analog signal has information if it is 16:9 or 4:3 (4:3 letterbox
is 4:3 and not 16:9) and a TV will switch according to that. (Should
not be mixed up with some auto modes in some TV that scans for black
areas and zooms). My question is if this information is send to the
firewire to preserve the ratio...
>> The price for ADVC-110 compared to ADVC-300 is rather big. If I
>> have
>> to go for the ADVC-300 I thing that TwinPact100 have almost the
>> same
>> price as ADVC-300. Is there any disadvantage of using the
>> TwinPact100
>> instead of ADVC-300 ?
In what way is ADVC-300 better than the twinpact ?
> The manuals (at least for the ADVC-100 I have) only cover button
> functions.
> By that I mean, button A does this and button B does this. There
> really
> isn't a whole lot more to the manual than is already mentioned on
> the
> website.
>
> Mike
Thanks for your comments !
Danne
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|