|
|
Posted by JoeBloe on 01/01/07 22:06
On 1 Jan 2007 03:30:46 -0800, Rexunrex@yahoo.com Gave us:
>
>Aaron J. Bossig wrote:
>
>> The flaw in that comparison is that DVD did, in fact, replace VHS.
>> Therefore, nothing prevents DVD from being replaced by someone else.
>
>For most people DVD is sufficient. If they don't buy the new
>display, or have the ability to play HDDVD/Bluray on their computer,
>they will not even be familiar with any improvement that high def
>offers. No familiarity means no purchases.
>
>Another factor that will prevent adoption is that most people
>already have an investment in DVDs. Who knows what the
>average # of DVDs per person or household is, but I know
>people who have 100. And of course libraries and video stores
>have 1000s. So if you tell those people they're going to have
>to put out another $2000 or $20,000 respecitvely for new
>discs and they will balk. Not to mention the need to buy
>a high-def screen, the drive, and maybe a video card.
It's not a "drive", dumbass. Get out of your PC centric fucktard
mentality.
The format was meant for home theater use. It is a DISC PLAYER.
The PLAYER pumps the DISPLAY just fine. No video card needed.
Oh, and what do ya know... ALL of my DVD library ALSO plays, and is
even resolution upconverted perfectly.
Get a clue, boy, you are miles behind the rest of the world.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|