|
|
Posted by JoeBloe on 01/02/07 02:21
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 14:52:37 -0800, "Alpha" <none@none.NET> Gave us:
>
>"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
>news:f72jp2hojh974mb56tbrr22ebsuk9v331m@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 12:44:37 -0800, "Alpha" <none@none.NET> Gave us:
>>
>>>If it takes a long time, it will fail. The next generation of video could
>>>well be based on direct cable or satellite transmission and stored on
>>>silicon (or one of the emerging new memory materials).
>>
>> You sure don't know much about data streams.
>
>Yes I do. I invented some.
You're a joke. What a pathetic claim.
>> Cable/over wire/air does not now, nor will it ever likely deliver
>> high end audio streams. The video is degraded on most channels too,
>> even some declared as hi def. Any given cable channel has 6MHz of
>> bandwidth. THAT's ALL. Tell me, chump, how does one pipe 25Mb/s over
>> a 6Mhz channel?
>
>Stupid question.
You're the idiot that thinks that we will be watching hi def
material over cable channels.
>> An HD DVD delivers the stream, and the audio NOW. Leave it to a
>> bunch of pants down past the asscrack idiots to look at the new thing,
>> scratch their heads and say "but does it work?".
>>
>> When are you dopes gonna get a clue?
>
>You are clueless.
I am fine, dumbfuck.
> Do you think the status quo will remain?
You are too fucking retarded to even know what the "status quo" is.
> The only
>constant in the universe is change...particularly for media.
Something you are completely clueless about.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|