|
|
Posted by MassiveProng on 01/10/07 12:28
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:04:03 -0000, "M.I.5?"
<no.one@no.where.NO_SPAM.co.uk> Gave us:
>
>"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
>news:tn77q21o681k7e2o2a5mi09m7j13o4cjof@4ax.com...
>> M.I.5? wrote:
>>
>>>>>Anyone who knows anything about digital
>>>>>representation will know that the highest resolution in the digital
>>>>>domain
>>>>>is half the number of digital samples (the Nyquist frequency) in this
>>>>>case
>>>>>represented by the display samples.
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit.
>>>
>>>One of the fundamental principles of digital techniques.
>>
>> Nope. We are not talking about the sampling rate required to digitize
>> an analog signal. We are talking about "pure" digital - a DVD full of
>> 1's and 0's, a digital link like HDMI, and a digital display device
>> like a DLP or LCD. A 1:1 ratio of pixels on the display device to
>> information on the DVD is all that is required. _Obviously_
>>
>
>Then try it for yourself. The difference is unmistakable. It may fly in
>the face of what you may think should be the case, but it happens to be
>true.
>
Sorry chump. Sending 480p content to my HD TV, and then filling out
the screen does not give the content a better display device.
720p does not look better than 1080i material.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|