|
|
Posted by Bob on 12/31/05 21:32
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:56:29 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs
<roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
>On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:48:21 GMT, spam@uce.gov (Bob) Gave us:
>
>>On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:24:00 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs
>><roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
>>
>>> There are NO DVD writable discs made with a directly exposed write
>>>surface. None.
>>
>>I never said there were.
>
> Yes, you did.
English must be a second language for you. I clearly said that the
active material was deposited directly on the bottom. I never said
anything about it being exposed. I always assumed there was a
protective film covering it.
>> I said the active material is on the bottom.
>
> Exactly. THAT is exactly what you said. Hey, dufus. The "active
>layer" is the polymer layer the laser makes pits on.
That has nothing to do with the presence or absence of a protective
coating.
>There are NO discs made with the active layer on the bottom.
There is at least one disc made with no active layer on top.
> You can't change your totally wrong argument to a simple semantic
>error. It won't work.
I never said anything about the active material being exposed, only
deposited on the bottom.
>>You are the one who is wrong when you claimed the active material is
>>directly on the top.
> I never, EVER said that.
Now you are lying.
I am ending this farce.
Like a woman you can have the last words.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|