|
|
Posted by NRen2k5 on 02/09/07 23:16
Paul Sture wrote:
> In article <asNyh.14424$tt1.63201@wagner.videotron.net>,
> NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com> wrote:
>
>> Paul Sture wrote:
>>> In article <0001HW.C1F06CA40016309CF0284648@news1.news.adelphia.net>,
>>> J.J. O'Shea <try.not.to@but.see.sig> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:24:58 -0500, Michelle Steiner wrote
>>>> (in article <michelle-3D0DB2.12245807022007@news.east.cox.net>):
>>>>
>>>>> In article <Topyh.46212$3D6.1944022@weber.videotron.net>,
>>>>> NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please don't try to use curly quotes on Usenet. They don't always work.
>>>>>> Stick with pure ASCII.
>>>>> I copied and pasted the article without attempting to edit it. I did
>>>>> not notice that they had used curly quotes.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> You gotta consider who's complaining.
>>>>
>>>> And the simple fact that if only he had a real newsreader, he'd not be
>>>> complaining, as real newsreaders showed either straight quotes or knew
>>>> enough
>>>> to show curly quotes and not some fool escape code.
>>>>
>>>> Ignore the twit.
>>> But yet another black mark against Thunderbird as a newsreader.
>> You mean newswatcher.
>
> No I don't. I speak as an ex-Thunderbird user, so do know the difference.
But you don't know the details in this case. If you did, you would
realize how foolish you're making yourself look right now.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|