|
|
Posted by Cori on 03/23/07 08:19
On Mar 22, 3:00 pm, sbt <dogbre...@chaseabone.com.invalid> wrote:
> Going from VHS to computer via the Canopus because you wish to do
> additional editing will result in (possibly much) higher quality than
> using the Zenith to encode and then doing a Canopus transfer,
Well, I assumed I wouldn't have to transfer to another form, once it
was on DVD, because a DVD can be played in the computer. The way I
transfer analog data with the Canopus is by using capture mode, then
feeding the captured material into the computer. I'm just asking if
material converted through the Canopus is of better quality than
material burned onto the Zenith, or no difference.
> Thus, if you don't need to edit, either "all-in-the-Zenith" or VHS to
> computer via ADVC followed by authoring on the Mac are roughly
> equivalent "least loss" processes -- it just depends on which has the
> best MPEG encoder.
> Spenser
How do I learn specs on the encoders? The Canopus manual is a piece
of worthless junk and I never learned anything about what it does or
how to use it except by going on the forums. The Zenith manual is
pretty detailed. Thanks for any indications.
Cori
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|