|
|
Posted by kim on 04/14/07 13:09
"Sean Black" <Gooner@pipex.net> wrote in message
news:Ipx1CNBqI3HGFwo1@aopv28%dsl.pipex.com...
> In message <d5OdnQ8keNS5qoPbRVnytAA@giganews.com>, kim <ntscuser@aol.com>
> writes
>>"Cesare Cioni" <uxbridge@spamcop.net> wrote in message
>>news:1hwe9nv.1vq3ws41fvm328N%uxbridge@spamcop.net...
>>> kim <ntscuser@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Finally, this afternoon, confirmation from Royal Mail:-
>>>>
>>>> "Thank you for your email regarding the handling fee we charge for
>>>> items
>>>> that have attracted a Customs fee.
>>>>
>>>> I can confirm that as of 2 April this fee was increased to 8. This
>>>> information is provided on the following page of our website:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.royalmail.com/portal/rm/content1?catId=400033&mediaId=400362
>>>>
>>>> If you require any further information about our products and services
>>>> please contact us again.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Paul Walsh
>>>> Customer Service Advisor "
>>>
>>> Weli, we are having problems with such fees in Italy, but I see that it
>>> is a common trend. The advantage of having customers that have no
>>> choice, I guess. Do you have a way to denounce this in the UK? Here in
>>> Italy we have complained everywhere, but to no avail.
>>>
>>> I wonder if it is done on purpose, to discourage indivuduals from taking
>>> advantage of international commerce while pretending that there is an
>>> "open market". It would certainly make the entertainment industry happy,
>>> as it makes it less convenient to buy Cds or DVDs from those markets
>>> where they sell the same items at a lower price.
>>
>>We are free to buy what we like up to a value of 18UKP. Above that figure
>>we
>>get hammered for charges. Individual disc titles are pretty much
>>unaffected,
>>it is boxed sets and combined shipments which suffer the most. The
>>stupidity
>>is, it costs the UK government much more to collect these charges on small
>>shipments than it raises in revenue.
>>
> Personally, I don't have a problem with paying import/VAT on the odd
> occasions I get charged it, it's just the fucking rip-off admin charge
> added by the Post Office. I'd like to know how exactly they can justify
> the original 4 charge, let alone before they doubled it!
I have a moral objection as a taxpayer that my taxes are being used to
subsidise the collection of further taxes which serve no useful purpose
whatsoever. Also that major importers are totally exempt from paying this
charge and in some cases even receive refunds of VAT payments they never
made in the first place!
(kim)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|