You are here: Re: Are British people confused by the Virginia mass shootings? « UK Media DVD Forum « DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Re: Are British people confused by the Virginia mass shootings?

Posted by imorf on 04/22/07 23:29

afn03488@afn.org wrote:
> On Apr 19, 6:04 pm, imorf <i...@iformRemovethis.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Indeed.
>> They should force all gun owners to at least join and participate in a
>> militia (since that is what their constitution is referring to).
>
> Please explain to me why "A well beaten egg white being necessary
> for the preparation of a good meringue, the right of the people to
> keep and raise chickens shall not be infringed", means that I may
> only raise chickens if I beat egg whites. Why can't I raise chickens
> just to pluck and fry them?

I'm fine with that as long as you don't use your chicken to kill other
people. But since you can't be trusted, I guess I'll be forced to carry
around my chicken in self-defence, wherever I go.

> This is just part of the crap that outlawing guns will prevent crime.
> You in Australia should be learning this first hand by now. Laws
> don't prevent crime; they cannot. Laws define crimes and prescribe
> the punishment for their commission. The simplest way to eliminate
> crime is to repeal all laws. No law, no crime. This is unacceptable
> to me, and probably to you also.
>
> Murder is universally a crime; there is already a statute in Virginia
> proscribing it. That law did not prevent 32 murders. What is idiotic
> is the notion of banning private ownership of guns will prevent
> violence. At Virginia Tech, and at Luby's, there was an existing
> ban on firearms. If the victims had carried their own weapons
> in violation of this ban, FEWER people would have died. Florida
> and Texas have already discovered their adoption of concealed
> carry has resulted in the decrease of armed robbery. Kleck
> discovered that burglars fear encountering an armed householder
> more than encountering the police. As Hienline put it, "In a fully
> armed society one is either very polite or very dead." Banning
> guns does not protect the general public; it only protects those
> willing to violate the ban from those who won't.

So basically, you feel it's fine to live your life having to take a gun
with you at all times, and having to be always mentally prepared to use
it. What a wonderful society to live in. I could type more, but it would
be wasting my time. The annual death by gun stats for the US says it all.

 

Navigation:

[Reply to this message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"