|
|
Posted by Doug Jacobs on 06/11/07 07:11
In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 GMAN <glenzabr@xmission.nospam.com> wrote:
> >* People already bought each movie separately, then bought the "ultimate
> >collection" - just how many times do you expect people to purchase the
> >same movies over and over again? (that goes for blu-ray titles too, you
> >know.)
> Waaaa, next you are going to complain that these new fangled memory styx are
> replacing your floppy drive. i mean according to you, that is all the storage
> you need.
Where did I complain about size in the above statement? My point is that
people already purchased Matrix. Why should they re-purchase it so soon?
There just isn't the same jump in quality this time that we saw with going
from VHS to DVD.
> games are already getting too big to fit on DVD, I hope you enjoy swapping
> disks with Halo3 on your 360.
Have you looked at the game sizes? On the 360, every game - save one -
has fit onto a DVD. The only game that doesn't fit on a single DVD is
Blue Dragon, but as a RPG, that's nothing new.
> >The rest of us are content to wait out the format war while playing
> >consoles that actually have decent libraries.
> You meant the few dozen 360 titles and handfull of old XBOX titles that play
> on it, or the 5000+ library of PS1,PS2, and PS3 games?
*sigh* I went over this before:
* The PS2 is better at playing PS2 and PS1 games than the US-PS3, and
definitely better than the EU-PS3 which uses software emulation.
* If you truly want to play PS2/PS1 games, buy a PS2 - it's less than
1/4th the cost of the PS3.
Now then, you mention "the few dozen 360 titles", but how many titles does
the PS3 again? Oh, yes, but it makes a darn good Folding@Home client.
Yeah, that's what I'm looking for in a game console.
--
It's not broken. It's...advanced.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|