|
|
Posted by *alan* on 07/03/07 00:29
"Todd" <weye07@pipex.com> wrote in message
news:5ernn2F3873quU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "§|ª®T?ߪRt?@$t" <§|ª®T?ߪRt?@$t@norway_coastline.net> wrote in message
> news:f65130$uju$1@aioe.org...
>> Winmx is alive and kicking and still by far the best source for music in
>> 320 & proper stereo, although one should not even attempt to use the
>> Winmx peer network. Only use the OpenNap Protocol Networks for best
>> results, free of fakes.
>>
> Mmmm, I wouldn't say that! I have often downloaded a long file from the
> OpenNap Protocol Network and it has been fake. So one cannot say it is
> "Free of fakes" sad but true!
>
> Cheers
> Todd
I've noticed that folks who use the OpenNap Protocol Networks pretty
consistently will tell you that the peer network is useless, but I've never
seen a defendable explanation for their assertion.
Perhaps it's because they've gone to a bit more trouble to establish their
connections thru the OpenNap that they'd like to believe they've made a
worthwhile decision. Then, of course, there's always plain old snob appeal
which may be the real motive for their assertions.
I'd be interested in seeing a cogent explanation from an OpenNap user . . .
--
Alan
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|