|
|
Posted by Telstar on 07/11/07 06:08
"boodybandit" <allaboutgamez@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:n5udnY4vk52fyxHbnZ2dnUVZ_qqrnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> "Spurious Response" <SpuriousResponse@cleansignal.org> wrote in message
> news:su7o8353rc21hv8ocnokkkj1p90frv35bk@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 15:15:16 -0700, "Telstar" <none@none.net> wrote:
>>
>>>The video is patently NOT several times better than upconverted DVD.
>>
>> Yes, it is.
>
> Without question!
> I just put this through some test this weekend comparing standard DVD's to
> Hi def (both BluRay and HD DVD) movies and the difference is very
> dramatic. When my wife can tell the difference (she was shicked how much
> better hi def DVD's are) anyone can. She couldn't tell the difference
> between $1,000 tower speakers to a $40,000 pair.
>
>> What resolution do you think an upconverted DVD operates at?
>> Any declaration greater than 480 is a wrong answer.
>>
>>> That
>>>is hyperbole.
>>
>> Your post is hyperbullshit.
>
>
I have done the same thing...different answer!
This is a big snake oil thing....just like DVD Audio. It was a huge
success????!!!!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|