|
|
Posted by WinField on 08/27/05 17:10
Mark Jones wrote:
> WinField wrote:
>
>>Mark Jones wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I might consider your opinion worthwhile if you can show that you
>>>have similar experience in the electronics industry.
>>
>> You are a Jehovah's Witness for gold connects. I've learned that
>>it's a waste of my time to argue religion with folks like you.
>>
>
> You can't provide anything to counter what I have learned based
> on many years of experience. This is based on factual information
> and real world results, not some "religious" belief.
>
> You lose.
Depends on who's judging the debate, Mark.
Your mention of your education/degree brought back some old memories for
me. I seemed to recall that I had learned that *GOLD* did not have the
lowest intrinsic resistance ...
I opened up one of my old school books [Grob|Third Edition "Basic
Electronics"]
- and found table 9*3 (p.212) Properties of Conducting Materials,
specific resistance(s) @20C, CMIL.Ohm/ft (that's circular mils)
(lower is better, except maybe for Mark's Community College)
Gold - 14
Copper - 10.4
Silver - 9.8
Wipe the egg off your face, if/when you get a gripe on reality. Copper
& Silver connects would have LESS of your precious contact resistance.
Got that, baby-cakes?
Winf
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|