|
|
Posted by Jyeshta on 08/26/07 17:54
On 25 Aug 2007 12:27:46 GMT, MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk wrote:
>Neil Fox's Juke Box on Capital Radio (week ending 15/March/1998)
>
>Certainty level: 70%
>
>Here is an excerpt from Neil Fox's show on Capital Radio 95.8FM, sometime
>during the week ending Sunday 15/March/1998 (probably during the weekend,
>but I don't remember).
>
>First I will give the text of the conversation between Neil Fox and
>telephone caller Martin, then I will state my interpretation.
>
>(conversation) (F=Dr Fox, M=Martin the caller)
>
>F: coming up on the jukebox, the hotline's 0171-4848-958, just a quick shout
>here and so who's this going to be then Mr Producer?
>(staff, shouting) MARTIN!
>F: Couldn't quite hear you, it's going to be?
>(staff, normal voice) Martin.
>F: Thank you. Martin, hello.
>M: Hello, Foxy.
>F: How are you Martin.
>M: Er, knackered.
>F: Why?
>M: Didn't get much sleep last night. Party down the road.
>F: What time did you go to bed?
>M: Four o'clock this morning.
>F: Well that sounds quite a reasonable Saturday night if you ask me.
>M: I was up at eight.
>F: You were up at eight this morning?
>M: Yeah.
>F: That's sick. Why? What on earth made you get out of bed at eight this
>morning?
>M: My father.
>F: Well that's no good. Why is he being sicko, is he being a sadist?
>M: No, he out there, sort of clearing room.
>F: Listen, is your dad there?
>M: No, he's downstairs.
>F: Oh mate, can you get him?
>M: No.
>F: Does he not let you on the phone? The only reason is that I wouldn't mind
>having a chat with someone who makes anyone get up at eight o'clock on a
>Sunday morning. I'm sorry, that's ill isn't it, that's out of order.
>M: It's sick.
>F: I'm just going to ask around here. What do you think then, eight o'clock
>Sunday morning? That's out of order isn't it, for any father?
>(staff) Yeah, definitely.
>F: Is he like victimising you or something, is there any reason why he wanted
>you up at eight o'clock? To clean your room?
>M: Well as I say I got up at eight this morning to clean my room and it looks
>worse that it did yesterday.
>F: Well I should have just left it and stayed in there until eleven o'clock
>if I was you.
>M: Well I was up, I didn't get out of bed.
>F: What, you didn't get out of bed at eight o'clock? No, he woke you up at
>eight o'clock. Did you do any cleaning at all?
>M: I haven't touched my bedroom.
>F: Top man. Boy you're going to get your arse kicked later aren't you. Now
>a song for you, what can we play?
>M: Guns and Roses, "Sweet Child of Mine".
>F: And we're going to dedicate this to your father?
>M: No we're not, we'll dedicate this to my good mate Jamie, who's sitting
>on the bed now.
>F: Right, hello Jamie. And anyone else? Any top totty in your life at the
>moment?
>M: Unfortunately no.
>F: The totty factor is quite low at the moment is it?
>M: It's dead.
>F: It's dead? What, nothing?
>M: Nothing.
>F: What, zero? Well, that's pathetic. No wonder you're down. You stay out
>til four o'clock and nothing. We'd better have words when we're off the
>radio I think. We need to give you a team talk. You have a good night tonight.
>M: And you.
>F: Take care.
>(song starts)
>F: Actually something was going through my mind. I think I'll leave it.
>
>I'm not really sure whether this is in any way about me. It probably isn't.
>Probably it's just my nasty suspicious mind finding links where none exist.
>However, here is an explanation of why it might, possibly, be about me.
>
>Throughout this interview, I was throwing abuse at the radio, and to my mind,
>Neil Fox was hearing the abuse, and responding interactively. This explains
>why he sounds so stressed when talking to telephone caller Martin, and the
>general violence of his words including "Boy you're going to get your arse
>kicked later aren't you".
>
>The piece starts of with the producer shouting the name of the caller, which
>might be related to my loud vocalisations at the radio. The trouble starts
>off with Fox saying "That's sick". "Sick" might be taken as a reference to my
>condition. Then Fox says, "Why is he being sicko, is he being a sadist?",
>again sick = my illness, "sadist" = attitude of my oppressors towards me.
>"that's ill isn't it" = further comment on my illness. "Is he like
>victimising you or something" = again what my enemies are doing to me.
>
>Fox sounds quite happy when he gets Martin to say "It's sick"; as you would
>expect him to, if the comment were directed at me. It is a constant feature
>of my enemies' harassment of me that they get intermediaries to verbalise the
>abuse. Immediately after saying "victimising you" Fox gives a little laugh,
>to show he thinks the victimisation (of me, not Martin) is funny.
>
>Fox gets increasingly nasty as the piece progresses. "Boy you're going to get
>your arse kicked later aren't you" is not really what you would expect him to
>say if he were just talking to Martin. Fox is on the same side as Martin, so
>why would he be so verbally aggressive to him? On the other hand, if the
>piece is about me, then his strong words start to make sense.
>
>Fox's jubilation at finding that Martin's "totty factor" is "dead" again
>doesn't make much sense unless you think that he might not be considering
>Martin's totty factor, but mine, since it's a fairly well known fact that my
>"totty factor" is not significantly above zero.
>
>To round off the 135 second interchange, just as the next track is starting,
>Fox says, "Actually something was going through my mind. I think I'll leave
>it". Given that I was chucking abuse at Fox throughout, it is only natural
>for him have thought up a reply that he would have wished to have made,
>except that such a reply would (a) probably not be suitable for a family
>show, and (b) have given the game away completely.
>
>So there you are. You the jury, what say you in the case of plaintiff vs.
>Neil Fox's Juke Box, guilty or not guilty?
>
>5904
Not guilty. I've been reading your posts off and on when you
cross-post them to groups I read. I never thought I'd reply
because I don't know what your real situation is, and also
because I think you bother people with the cross-posting and I
didn't want to do that myself.
But I do want to reply right now, because I think you're going
off-track with your suspicions in some of these posts from
yesterday and today and I am hoping to explain to you what I
think about it from my perspective.
I have no opinion one way or another as to whether you have been,
or are being harassed or persecuted by government agencies and
the media.
The example in this post only demonstrates that there was a tense
energy at the time of the radio transmission on that particular
day and/or hour. I believe this because I've been studying
astrology for decades and I know from observation (as all serious
students of astrology do) that the energies of various moments,
hours, days, or other timespans can be quite notable and
expresses through people's moods, behavior, and also even by
events such as structural failures, fires, etc.
If you think of astrology as being very akin to weather patterns,
I think that's the best parallel I can make.
You know that when it's raining during a Saturday afternoon, for
example, when people were hoping to have a nice day out, or a
Monday morning, when they have to go back to the work week, which
usually is unpleasant in itself, people behave differently than
if the weather is sunny and pleasant. It's very much the same
sort of dynamic with astrological influences.
So it seems to me that something bad did happen to you at some
point, although I still don't know whether it's government and
media persecution, and that you do go too far to look for further
abuse when it isn't really about you at all.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|