|
Posted by PTravel on 10/02/07 21:24
"Smarty" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote in message
news:V5xMi.13081$bV2.7046@trndny02...
> The HV20 is cheaply built but takes excellent video, way better than the 3
> CCD HDV Sony camcorder (FX-1) and the HC3 I previously owned. The audio
> quality is good but not excellent. I would strongly recommend the HV20
> after owning and using several HDV camcorders. It is a great bargain now
> for well below $1000 in the U.S.
>
> Smarty
How does the HV20 do in lowlight? I want to move up to an HDV machine
(never AVCHD), but I've been spoiled by the performance of VX2000.
>
>
> "Luru Dai" <kikidai@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1191313920.077901.108760@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>I will buy a camcorder in Nov. for my coming baby. But I hesitate
>> between Sony A1 and Canon HV20. I know hesitation between them is
>> weird, since A1 is pro camcorder and HV20 is consumer one. I like a
>> more professional mode. I like to do adjusting. Concerning my budget,
>> Sony A1 seems the only choice in professional products. I also like
>> its small size and crazy with it sound system. But, it is too old,
>> released about 2 years already. The CMOS is the old generation, even
>> before HC3 and seems have bad low light performance as I heard(Not
>> sure).
>>
>> Camcorderinfo.com review says that Canon HV20 is pretty good, seems
>> the best in its competitors(Over Sony HC7). For me, it is a camcorder
>> with ugly looking, covered with cheap plastic, hard to handle(the
>> review said) and a customer model. I am not fancy with it, but if it
>> is good, it is good.
>>
>> I like A1, in fact I planed to buy A1 one year before, for some reason
>> I didn't make it. But electronic stuffs develop so quickly. A normal
>> desktop computer is comparable with a super computer 5 year before. To
>> buy a model released for two years may not smart.
>>
>> I beg your suggestion. I couldn't wait any more to buy one. Thank you
>> in advance.
>>
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|