|
|
Posted by ChairmanOfTheBored on 10/26/07 00:18
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:03:26 -0000, Doug Jacobs <djacobs@shell.rawbw.com>
wrote:
>Richard C. <post-age@spamcop.net> wrote:
>
>> MANY also have HD feeds.
>
>True, but it's still not the majority
You're an idiot.
> - and there are some rather odd
>gaps.
Between your ears.
> For instance, why don't Sci-Fi and Comedy Central offer HD? Then
>there's the hilariously mis-named "Tech TV" which isn't in HD. I heard
>Cartoon Network recently started a HD feed, though Dish Network hasn't
>started offering it yet.
You're on Dish? Bwuahahahahaha! That says a lot.
> Then again, I have to wonder...what is the
>purpose of CN in HD at all?
The gap between your ears is rearing its ugly head again.
> Most of their shows are still going to be 4:3
>SD. None of the news channels offer HD, which again seems rather silly.
>CSPAN doesn't...well, who watches CSPAN anyways? ;)
>
>The movie channels do offer HD, but I don't subscribe to those.
And some aren't really HD either.
>Some of the smaller local channels by me don't offer HD - like KTSF, which
>carries a lot of non-English programs, including the Chinese
>comedy/variety programs my wife likes.
I'll bet they have a Digital broadcast/cablecast though. Form factor
doesn't matter.
>Even those channels that do have a HD feed, don't always carry the same
>programming.
No shit, Dip Tracy.
> Food Network HD has a totally different schedule compared to
>the regular, non-HD Food Network. This is probably because not all of
>Food Network's shows (or even episodes) are HD.
More likely because you guess at everything you spew.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|