Posted by Johan St�ck on 11/09/07 08:40

nappy skrev:
> "Johan Stäck" <johan@stack.se> wrote in message
> news:5pgks1Fr521pU1@mid.individual.net...
>
>> So, with virtually all TV sets being sold today being unable to handle an
>> interlaced signal as it is (they must first de-interlace), why are almost
>> all consumer HDV camcorders outputting an interlaced signal?
>
> For monitoring.
Could you elaborate on this?
>
>> What is a recommendable "entry-level " HDV camcorder that offers a true
>> progressive picture?
>
> I think the crowd here prefers the Canon HV20
That is *very* evident.
However, in spite of all my attempts, I fail to understand what the
"progressive" feature of the HV20 really is.
I have the feeling that Canon in some (albeit cunning) way construct the
progressive images by processing interlaced images in some way.
Is there any documentation available on this?

/JS
>
>
>
>
>

• Next in forum: Re: What will you be replacing your CRT monitor with?
• Prev in forum: Re: Canon HV-20 wins 2007 award as "Best HDV Camcorder"
• Thread view: Re: Why interlace?

[Reply to this message]